← All medicines

Temsirolimus

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase inhibitors · given by intravenous · on the market since 2007

Leads
People
2
Makers
0
How abandoned
01

What it's made of

Each functional group on the molecule does a specific, predictable job.

SETS WHERE IT GOES

Sugar ring

What it does. Extremely water-loving. Adding one to a molecule usually destroys its ability to cross the gut wall, which is why many such drugs must be injected.

What it opens up. If given by mouth it stays in the gut and acts there only — a targeting advantage for intestinal disease.

SETS HOW LONG IT LASTS

Ester

What it does. Blood and tissue enzymes cut this bond within minutes. Whatever was attached falls off.

What it opens up. Deliberate short action, or a delivery trick — attach an ester to sneak a molecule somewhere, then let the body cut it loose at the destination.

CARRIES THE MAIN JOB

Conjugated chain

What it does. Rigid, light-sensitive, and shaped to fit receptors that control cell maturation — the switch that tells an immature cell to grow up.

What it opens up. Any disease of cells that fail to mature properly, which includes both skin conditions and certain leukaemias.

02

Where it can get to

Predicted from molecular weight, lipophilicity, polar surface area and hydrogen-bond donor count. A drug can only act where it distributes, so this constrains which conditions are addressable before any biology is considered. derived

Barely
Systemic circulation
Absorbed from the gut and distributed in plasma.
No
Central nervous system
Crosses the blood–brain barrier.
Partly
Intestinal lumen only
Poorly absorbed. Acts locally in the gut with minimal systemic exposure.
No
Skin
Crosses the stratum corneum. Viable as a topical.
Barely
Urinary tract
Cleared unchanged in urine. Local concentration exceeds plasma.
03

What it binds — and whether we can reach it

Binding affinity is only meaningful against the plasma concentration reached at the approved dose. A target requiring higher concentrations cannot be engaged in a patient, whatever the in vitro potency. Most repurposing hypotheses fail at this step, and it is rarely checked before a trial is proposed. measured

Values are pAct — the negative logarithm of the molar concentration at which the drug half-occupies the target. Each whole step is a tenfold difference in potency: 9.0 = 1 nanomolar, 6.0 = 1 micromolar, 5.0 = 10 micromolar. Oral drugs typically reach 0.1–10 micromolar in plasma, so roughly 6.0 is the threshold below which a target cannot be reached at a tolerated dose. Figures come from DrugCentral’s curated binding data.
FKBP1A
Enzyme · inhibitor
Never measured
04

New uses, and who is already trying them

Not yet analysed

This drug’s measured targets have no disease links above the evidence threshold.

05

Why nobody will fund it

2 companies make this across 2 approved products. With that many manufacturers the price has fallen to production cost. A company funding a trial could not recover it — competitors could market the same molecule for the new indication immediately, without contributing.

How abandoned it is0 / 100
0 to 100, calculated from manufacturer count, remaining patent or exclusivity, and whether any reformulation route to exclusivity is still open. 100 means no route to commercial return exists. The weights behind it are unsourced.
THE ONE WAY A COMPANY COULD STILL OWN IT
inhaledmodified-release

A new route or dosage form qualifies for a 505(b)(2) application, which carries three years of exclusivity for that formulation. It is the only remaining route to exclusivity on a generic molecule.

06

What it would cost to find out

Derived, not quoted. Events needed is 4(zα+zβ)²/ln(HR)²; enrolment is that divided by the event rate and follow-up. The 1/ln(HR)² term dominates: halving the detectable effect size roughly quadruples enrolment. derived

0.75
Lower = bigger effect = smaller trial
8.0%
2 yr
$32K
Unsourced placeholder
379
Events needed
3K
Patients
$93M
Trial cost
assumed
Per person reached
assumed

Cost per person reached is the relevant metric for a non-commercial funder, since there is no revenue to set against the outlay.

07

Ask for ideas nobody has listed

Reasons from the functional groups and distribution above, excluding conditions already listed. Output is hypotheses for falsification, not findings. Not medical advice.

08

Who might pay for the trial

Trials of off-patent drugs are rarely funded by venture capital or pharma. They are paid for by government grants and disease foundations. Here is who has funded work on this molecule before, what federal mechanisms are open now, and which foundations fund trials in the disease areas it touches. measured

Federal grants that name this medicine
88 grants on NIH RePORTER
5R01CA260006-06(NCI · National Cancer Institute)Active
$295K (2026)
Metabolic Control and Anticancer Mechanism
PI: Zheng, Steven · Rutgers Biomedical And Health Sciences, Newark, NJ · through 2027-06
5R44HL102998-06(NHLBI · National Heart, Lung & Blood Institute)Active
$1.0M (2026)
Improved Sirolimus-Analog Adventitial Delivery to Enhance Outcomes in Below-the-Knee Peripheral Artery Disease
PI: Seward, Kirk · Mercator Medsystems, Inc., San Leandro, CA · through 2026-12
5R01CA260006-05(NCI · National Cancer Institute)Concluded
$295K (2025)
Metabolic Control and Anticancer Mechanism
PI: Zheng, Steven · Rutgers Biomedical And Health Sciences, Newark, NJ · through 2027-06
Open federal programmes that would fund this work

Open notices with an explicit mandate to fund work on approved or off-patent molecules.

RFA-CA-25-033National Institutes of HealthForecast — not open yet
Glioblastoma Therapeutics Network (GTN; U19 Clinical Trial Required)
RFA-FD-25-020Food and Drug Administrationcloses 05/16/2028
Reissue of RFA-FD-23-001- Clinical Studies of Orphan Products Addressing Unmet
FOR-FD-25-020Food and Drug AdministrationForecast — not open yet
Clinical Studies of Orphan Products Addressing Unmet Needs of Rare Diseases (R
FOR-FD-25-001Food and Drug AdministrationForecast — not open yet
Clinical Trials Addressing Unmet Needs of Rare Neurodegenerative Diseases (R01
RFA-TR-25-002National Institutes of Healthcloses 07/02/2027
Preclinical Proof of Concept Studies for Rare Diseases (R21 Clinical Trial Not
PAR-25-374National Institutes of Healthcloses 05/07/2028
Translational Bioinformatics and Experimental Approaches to Advance Drug Repos
HT942526PRCRPCTADefense Health Agency Contracting Activity -closes 10/05/2026
DoW Peer Reviewed Cancer, Clinical Trial Award
PAR-26-049National Institutes of HealthForecast — not open yet
Establishing Pediatric CNS Pharmacodynamic Measures as Tools to Enable Psychia
Showing 8 of 990 currently open under this category on Grants.gov, matched to the disease areas this drug touches. derived Browse all 990 on Grants.gov ↗
Funders beyond the federal system

Grants.gov lists US federal money. Many off-patent drug trials are supported by disease foundations and nonprofits. These are matched to the body systems this drug touches. assumed

Matched by disease area, not by molecule — a foundation appearing here funds work in a field this drug touches.
09

Who manufactures it

Companies holding an approved abbreviated application for this molecule in the United States, from the FDA Orange Book. Supply already exists at scale, so a trial would not need a manufacturing programme — but any of these could also be a partner, or an objector.

Accord Healthcare IncGland Pharma Ltd
2
Manufacturers
companies with their own approval
2
Approved products
distinct strengths and forms
1
Routes
intravenous
2007
Oldest product still sold
approval year of the earliest product still on the market
ALSO SOLD AS
TORISEL

Nothing on this page is medical advice. Candidate uses are unproven hypotheses derived from public data; established uses are listed for verification only. Figures carry their provenance inline — anything marked assumed or derived is not a measurement.

← Back to the full ledger